Electronic Spectroscopy, NMR and ESR
Why every electronic transition drags vibrational and rotational structure along with it, and the three energy scales involved.
Selection rules for electronic transitions in diatomic molecules.
The Franck–Condon principle and the three shapes an intensity distribution can take.
Progressions, sequences and the Deslandres table.
Dissociation energy from the convergence limit.
\(P\), \(Q\) and \(R\) branches, band heads, and why bands are shaded.
10.1 Introduction
For each electronic state of a molecule there is a potential energy curve with a minimum at the equilibrium nuclear separation. Hence for every electronic state there is a set of vibrational states; and since the molecule rotates while it vibrates, each vibrational level carries its own set of rotational levels. Electronic spectra therefore have a three-tier structure.
The total energy of a molecule is \begin{equation} E = E_{e} + E_{v} + E_{r}, \label{eq:total-energy} \end{equation} with the three contributions of very different size: \begin{equation} \Delta E_{e} \approx 1\text{--}10\,\mathrm{eV}, \qquad \Delta E_{v} \approx 0.1\,\mathrm{eV}, \qquad \Delta E_{r} \approx 0.001\,\mathrm{eV}. \label{eq:energy-scales} \end{equation}
The scaling of these three is a question in its own right (GATE 2020, GATE 2022). With \(m\) the electron mass and \(M\) the nuclear mass, \[ E_{v} \sim \left(\frac{m}{M}\right)^{1/2} E_{e}, \qquad E_{r} \sim \left(\frac{m}{M}\right) E_{e} . \] With \(m/M \sim 10^{-4}\) these give the ratios \(1 : 10^{-2} : 10^{-4}\), exactly the pattern of \(\eqref{eq:energy-scales}\).
Because \(\Delta E_{e} \gg \Delta E_{v} \gg \Delta E_{r}\), a change of electronic state is always accompanied by changes in the vibrational and rotational state. Dividing \(\eqref{eq:total-energy}\) by \(hc\) to work in wavenumbers, \begin{equation} \varepsilon = \frac{E}{hc} = \frac{E_{e}}{hc} + \frac{E_{v}}{hc} + \frac{E_{r}}{hc} = \varepsilon_{e} + G(v) + F(J), \label{eq:wavenumber-terms} \end{equation} where, from Chapters 7 and 8, \begin{equation} G(v) = \omega_{e}\left(v+\tfrac12\right) - \omega_{e}x_{e}\left(v+\tfrac12\right)^{2}, \qquad F(J) = BJ(J+1). \end{equation}
A transition between two electronic states (single prime \('\) = upper, double prime \(''\) = lower) therefore appears at \begin{equation} \boxed{\; \bar\nu = \left(\varepsilon_{e}' - \varepsilon_{e}''\right) + \left\{G(v') - G(v'')\right\} + \left\{F(J') - F(J'')\right\} . \;} \label{eq:elec-transition} \end{equation}
10.2 Selection Rules
For a diatomic molecule the electronic state is labelled \(^{2S+1}\Lambda^{\pm}_{g/u}\), where \(\Lambda = 0, 1, 2, \dots\) (written \(\Sigma, \Pi, \Delta, \dots\)) is the projection of the electronic orbital angular momentum on the internuclear axis, \(S\) is the total electron spin, the \(\pm\) superscript is the reflection symmetry of a \(\Sigma\) state in a plane containing the axis, and \(g/u\) applies to homonuclear molecules only.
\[ \Delta\Lambda = 0, \pm 1 \qquad \Delta S = 0 \qquad \Sigma^{+} \leftrightarrow \Sigma^{+}, \quad \Sigma^{-} \leftrightarrow \Sigma^{-} \qquad g \leftrightarrow u \] Vibrational: no restriction at all on \(\Delta v\). Every \((v', v'')\) pair is allowed; the Franck–Condon principle decides only how intense each is.
Rotational: \(\Delta J = 0, \pm 1\), with \(\Delta J = 0\) forbidden when \(\Lambda' = \Lambda'' = 0\), and \(J = 0 \nleftrightarrow J = 0\).
The manuscript prints the selection rules with a \(\nabla\) in place of \(\Delta\), and gives “\(\Delta n = \pm1, \pm2, \pm3, \pm4\dots\)” as though there were a rule on a principal quantum number. There is no such rule for molecular electronic spectra. The statement immediately following in the source — “there is no restriction on vibrational transition in electronic spectra” — is the correct and important one, and has been promoted into the box above.
The rule \(\Delta S = 0\) is what makes singlet–triplet transitions weak, and it weakens in heavy molecules for the same spin–orbit reason met in Chapter 3. Phosphorescence is precisely a slow, nominally forbidden triplet \(\to\) singlet transition.
10.3 Electronic–Vibrational Spectra
Ignoring rotation for the moment, \(\eqref{eq:elec-transition}\) gives the positions of the bands: \begin{equation} \bar\nu = \bar\nu_{\text{el}} + \left[\omega_{e}'\left(v'+\tfrac12\right) - \omega_{e}'x_{e}'\left(v'+\tfrac12\right)^{2}\right] - \left[\omega_{e}''\left(v''+\tfrac12\right) - \omega_{e}''x_{e}''\left(v''+\tfrac12\right)^{2}\right]. \label{eq:band-positions} \end{equation} The whole set of bands is a band system. Within it:
a progression is a set of bands with one of \(v'\), \(v''\) held fixed — e.g.\ \((0,0), (0,1), (0,2), \dots\) is the \(v'=0\) progression;
a sequence is a set with \(\Delta v = v'-v''\) fixed — e.g.\ \((0,0), (1,1), (2,2), \dots\). Because \(\omega_e' \approx \omega_e''\), a sequence forms a tight, closely spaced group, as in Figure 10.1.
Arranging the band wavenumbers in a table with \(v'\) along one axis and \(v''\) along the other gives a Deslandres table. Differences along a row give the vibrational spacings of the lower state, differences down a column give those of the upper state — so one table yields \(\omega_e''\), \(\omega_e''x_e''\), \(\omega_e'\) and \(\omega_e'x_e'\) at once.
At room temperature only \(v'' = 0\) is populated, so an absorption spectrum shows essentially one progression: \((0,0), (1,0), (2,0), \dots\), called the \(v''=0\) progression. An emission spectrum, obtained from a discharge, shows many progressions because many upper levels are populated. This asymmetry is worth remembering — it is why absorption spectra are so much simpler to interpret.
10.4 The Franck–Condon Principle
An electronic transition takes place so rapidly (\(\sime-15\,\mathrm{s}\)) compared with the period of nuclear vibration (\(\sime-13\,\mathrm{s}\)) that the internuclear distance does not change appreciably during the transition.
Transitions are therefore drawn as vertical lines on a potential energy diagram.
The consequence is an intensity rule. A vibrating molecule spends most of its time near the turning points of its motion, and in the \(v=0\) level the probability density is greatest at the centre of the potential well. The most intense band is the one whose vertical line starts where the lower state's molecules are and ends where the upper state's wavefunction is large.
Let \(r_{e}''\) and \(r_{e}'\) be the equilibrium internuclear separations of the lower (ground) and upper (excited) states. Since the ground vibrational level is heavily populated, almost all transitions start from \(v''=0\). Three cases arise.
Case 1: \(r_{e}' = r_{e}''\)
The ground vibrational level is heavily populated, so almost all transitions start from \(v'' = 0\). A vertical line from the centre of the lower well arrives at the centre of the upper well, which is where the \(v' = 0\) wavefunction peaks. The probable transition is \(v''=0 \to v'=0\), so the \((0,0)\) band has maximum intensity, and the \(v''=0 \to v'=1,2,3,4\) bands are progressively weaker.
Case 2: \(r_{e}' > r_{e}''\)
The upper curve is displaced to larger \(r\). The vertical line from \(v''=0\) now arrives on the inner wall of the upper well, at a level of moderate \(v'\) — typically \(v'=2\). Then the \((2,0)\) band is the strongest, and the intensity falls off rapidly on both sides of it. The maximum has moved away from \((0,0)\): this displacement is itself the measurement of \(r_{e}' - r_{e}''\).
Case 3: \(r_{e}' \gg r_{e}''\)
The upper curve is displaced so far that the vertical line from \(v''=0\) passes straight through the top of the upper well and into the continuum above its dissociation limit. The molecule flies apart — this is photodissociation. The spectrum consists of a progression of weak discrete bands running up to a convergence limit, joined to a strong continuum at higher wavenumber.
The source describes Case 2 as transition to “tower or higher \(v'\) states”; read lower or higher. In Case 1 it also has “for energy electronic state” where “for every electronic state” is meant.
The exam version of this is short: given a figure with two potential curves, say which band is strongest. Draw the vertical line up from the minimum of the lower curve and read off where it hits the upper curve. That is the answer — no arithmetic required.
10.5 Dissociation Energy from the Convergence Limit
In Case 3 the discrete bands crowd together and converge. The convergence limit \(\bar\nu_{\text{conv}}\) is the energy needed to take the molecule from \(v''=0\) of the ground state to the dissociation limit of the upper state. That limit produces one atom in its ground state and one in an excited state, of excitation energy \(E^{*}\). Hence \begin{equation} \boxed{\ D_{0}'' = \bar\nu_{\text{conv}} - E^{*} \ } \label{eq:D0-convergence} \end{equation} where all terms are in \(\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\). This is the most accurate route to a dissociation energy, and it is why electronic spectra are the standard tool for measuring bond strengths.
\(E^{*}\) must be supplied independently, from the atomic spectrum of the fragment. Forgetting to subtract it is the standard trap: it gives the dissociation energy of the wrong state. If the convergence limit gives both atoms in the ground state, then \(E^{*}=0\) and \(D_0'' = \bar\nu_{\text{conv}}\) directly.
When the bands converge too slowly to see the limit, the Birge–Sponer extrapolation is used instead: plot the successive band separations \(\Delta G(v+\tfrac12) = G(v+1)-G(v)\) against \(v\), which is a straight line for a Morse potential, and the area under it out to the intercept is \(D_{0}\). This reproduces the result of Chapter 8, \[ D_{0} = \frac{\omega_{e}}{4x_{e}} - \frac{\omega_{e}}{2} + \frac{\omega_{e}x_{e}}{4} . \]
10.6 Rotational Fine Structure
Each band of Figure 10.1 is itself a close-packed group of rotational lines. Writing \(B'\) and \(B''\) for the rotational constants of the upper and lower states, and \(\bar\nu_{0}\) for the band origin, \begin{equation} \bar\nu = \bar\nu_{0} + B'J'(J'+1) - B''J''(J''+1), \qquad \Delta J = 0, \pm 1 . \end{equation} This gives three branches:
| Branch | \(\Delta J\) | Position | Present when |
|---|---|---|---|
| \(P\) | \(-1\) | \(\bar\nu_{0} - (B'+B'')J + (B'-B'')J^{2}\) | always |
| \(Q\) | \(0\) | \(\bar\nu_{0} + (B'-B'')J(J+1)\) | \(\Lambda \ne 0\) in one state |
| \(R\) | \(+1\) | \(\bar\nu_{0} + (B'+B'')(J+1) + (B'-B'')(J+1)^{2}\) | always |
The crucial difference from a vibration–rotation band (Chapter 8) is that \(B'\) and \(B''\) now belong to different electronic states and differ substantially — typically by 5–10 %, not the fraction of a percent seen within one electronic state. The quadratic term is therefore no longer negligible, and one of the branches turns back on itself.
Writing \(m = J+1\) for the \(R\) branch and \(m = -J\) for the \(P\) branch, both
branches are one formula:
\[
\bar\nu = \bar\nu_{0} + (B'+B'')m + (B'-B'')m^{2} .
\]
The turning point — the band head — is at
\[
m_{\text{head}} = -\frac{B'+B''}{2(B'-B'')},
\qquad
\bar\nu_{\text{head}} = \bar\nu_{0} - \frac{(B'+B'')^{2}}{4(B'-B'')} .
\]
If \(B' < B''\) (upper state has the longer bond, the usual case):
head in the \(R\) branch, band degraded towards the red.
If \(B' > B''\): head in the \(P\) branch, band degraded towards
the violet.
“Degraded towards the red” means the band is sharp at its violet edge (the head) and fades away towards longer wavelength. Since an electronic excitation usually weakens the bond, \(r_{e}' > r_{e}''\), so \(B' < B''\), and most bands are red-degraded. Notice this is the same inequality that produced Franck–Condon Case 2 — one piece of physics, two observable consequences.
10.7 Applications
Electronic spectra give:
dissociation energies, from the convergence limit \(\eqref{eq:D0-convergence}\) — including for molecules whose ground state has no infrared or microwave spectrum at all;
vibrational constants \(\omega_{e}\), \(\omega_{e}x_{e}\) of both the ground and excited states, from a Deslandres table;
bond lengths in excited states, via \(B'\) from the rotational fine structure;
the shape of the excited-state potential curve, from the Franck–Condon intensity distribution;
analytical identification — every molecule has a characteristic band system in the visible or ultraviolet.
10.8 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
NMR is the resonant absorption of radio-frequency radiation by atomic nuclei placed in a static magnetic field.
| Protons | Neutrons | Nuclear spin \(I\) | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| even | even | \(0\) — NMR silent | \(^{12}\)C, \(^{16}\)O |
| odd | odd | positive integer | \(^{2}\)H \((I=1)\), \(^{14}\)N \((I=1)\) |
| odd/even | even/odd | half-integer | \(^{1}\)H \((I=\tfrac12)\), \(^{13}\)C \((I=\tfrac12)\), \(^{17}\)O \((I=\tfrac52)\) |
Discussion
Place a nucleus in a static field \(B\) along \(z\). The interaction energy between the nuclear magnetic moment \(\vec\mu_{n}\) and the field is \begin{equation} E = -\vec\mu_{n}\cdot\vec B , \qquad \vec\mu_{n} = -g_{N}\frac{\mu_{N}}{\hbar}\,\vec I_{n} , \label{eq:nmr-energy} \end{equation} where \(\vec I_{n}\) is the nuclear spin angular momentum with eigenvalue \(\sqrt{I(I+1)}\,\hbar\), \(g_{N}\) is the nuclear \(g\) factor, and \begin{equation} \mu_{N} = \frac{e\hbar}{2m_{p}} = 5.051\times 10^{-27}\,\mathrm{J}/\mathrm{T} \qquad\text{(the \textbf{nuclear magneton}).} \label{eq:nuclear-magneton} \end{equation}
The nuclear magneton is printed with the units \(\mathrm{N}/\mathrm{m}^2\); the correct unit is \(\mathrm{J}/\mathrm{T}\) (equivalently \(\mathrm{A}\,\mathrm{m}^2\)). The numerical value is right.
Writing \(\cos\theta = I_{z}/I_{n}\) for the angle between \(\vec I_{n}\) and \(\vec B\), equation \(\eqref{eq:nmr-energy}\) becomes \begin{equation} E = -\frac{g_{N}\mu_{N}}{\hbar}\,I_{n}B\cos\theta = -\frac{g_{N}\mu_{N}}{\hbar}\,I_{z}B = -g_{N}\mu_{N}B\,m_{I} , \label{eq:nmr-levels} \end{equation} using \(I_{z} = m_{I}\hbar\) with \(m_{I} = -I, \dots, +I\).
A single level therefore splits into \(2I+1\) equally spaced sublevels. For \(I = \tfrac12\), \(m_{I} = \pm\tfrac12\) and \begin{equation} E_{-} = +\tfrac12 g_{N}\mu_{N}B \quad (m_{I} = -\tfrac12), \qquad E_{+} = -\tfrac12 g_{N}\mu_{N}B \quad (m_{I} = +\tfrac12), \end{equation} so the splitting is \begin{equation} \boxed{\ \Delta E = E_{-} - E_{+} = g_{N}\mu_{N}B \ } \label{eq:nmr-split} \end{equation} and resonance occurs when \begin{equation} h\nu = g_{N}\mu_{N}B . \label{eq:nmr-resonance} \end{equation} Resonance may be reached either by sweeping \(B\) at fixed \(\nu\) or by sweeping \(\nu\) at fixed \(B\).
Order of magnitude. For \(I = \tfrac12\) take \(g_{N} \approx 2\). At \(B = 1\,\mathrm{T}\), \[ \Delta E = 2\times5.051\times10^{-27}\times1 = 1.01\times10^{-26}\ \mathrm{J} = \frac{1.01\times10^{-26}}{1.6\times10^{-19}}\ \eV = 6.3\times10^{-8}\ \eV , \] which is a radio-frequency photon. NMR is therefore observed under radio-frequency irradiation.
A proton is placed in a magnetic field of \(1.5\,\mathrm{T}\). Find the energy difference between its two states and the frequency of the radiation required for resonance. Take \(g_{N} = 5.587\).
Solution. From \(\eqref{eq:nmr-split}\), \[ \Delta E = g_{N}\mu_{N}B = 5.587\times5.051\times10^{-27}\times1.5 = 4.23\times10^{-26}\ \mathrm{J} . \] Hence \[ \nu = \frac{\Delta E}{h} = \frac{4.23\times10^{-26}}{6.626\times10^{-34}} = 63.9\,\mathrm{MHz} . \] This is the familiar “60 MHz NMR” of the chemistry laboratory.
Applications. Determination of \(g_{N}\) and \(\mu_{N}\); chemical analysis via the chemical shift; and magnetic resonance imaging.
10.9 Electron Spin Resonance (ESR / EPR)
ESR (equivalently EPR, electron paramagnetic resonance) is the same physics with electron spins in place of nuclear spins. The material must contain one or more unpaired electrons — free radicals, transition-metal ions, colour centres.
The interaction energy of the electron spin magnetic moment with a field \(B_{0}\) along \(z\) is \begin{equation} E = -\vec\mu_{e}\cdot\vec B_{0}, \qquad \vec\mu_{e} = -g_{e}\frac{\mu_{B}}{\hbar}\vec S, \qquad \mu_{B} = \frac{e\hbar}{2m_{e}} = 9.27\times 10^{-24}\,\mathrm{J}/\mathrm{T} , \label{eq:esr-energy} \end{equation} where \(\vec S\) has eigenvalue \(\sqrt{s(s+1)}\,\hbar\) and \(\mu_{B}\) is the Bohr magneton. Then \begin{equation} E = g_{e}\frac{\mu_{B}}{\hbar}\,\vec S\cdot\vec B = g_{e}\frac{\mu_{B}}{\hbar}\,S B\cos\theta = g_{e}\frac{\mu_{B}}{\hbar}\,B S_{z} = g_{e}\mu_{B}B\,m_{s} , \label{eq:esr-levels} \end{equation} using \(S_{z} = m_{s}\hbar\). For \(s = \tfrac12\), \(m_{s} = \pm\tfrac12\): \begin{equation} E_{+} = +\tfrac12 g_{e}\mu_{B}B, \qquad E_{-} = -\tfrac12 g_{e}\mu_{B}B, \qquad \boxed{\ \Delta E = g_{e}\mu_{B}B \ } \label{eq:esr-split} \end{equation} and the resonance condition is \begin{equation} h\nu = g_{e}\mu_{B}B . \label{eq:esr-resonance} \end{equation}
Order of magnitude. With \(g_{e} \approx 2\), \(\Delta E = 1.85\times10^{-23}B\) joule. At \(B = 2\,\mathrm{T}\), \[ \Delta E = 3.7\times10^{-23}\ \mathrm{J} = 2.3\times10^{-4}\ \eV , \] a microwave photon. ESR is therefore performed under microwave irradiation — typically in the X band, near \(9.5\,\mathrm{GHz}\), which for \(g \approx 2\) corresponds to \(B \approx 0.34\,\mathrm{T}\).
A free electron is placed in a magnetic field of \(1.3\,\mathrm{T}\). Find the resonance frequency, given \(g = 2.0023\) and \(\mu_{B} = 9.27\times 10^{-24}\,\mathrm{J}/\mathrm{T}\).
Solution. From \(\eqref{eq:esr-resonance}\), \[ \nu = \frac{g\mu_{B}B}{h} = \frac{2.0023\times9.27\times10^{-24}\times1.3}{6.6\times10^{-34}} = 3.66\times10^{10}\ \mathrm{Hz} = 36.6\,\mathrm{GHz} . \]
The manuscript gives this answer as \(36.43\,\mathrm{MHz}\). The arithmetic is right but the unit is not: the result is gigahertz, not megahertz. The internal check is the chapter's own statement two lines earlier that ESR requires microwaves — \(36\,\mathrm{MHz}\) is an FM-radio frequency. The useful rule of thumb is \[ \frac{\nu}{B} \approx 28\,\mathrm{GHz}/\mathrm{T} \quad \text{for a free electron}, \qquad \frac{\nu}{B} \approx 42.6\,\mathrm{MHz}/\mathrm{T} \quad \text{for a proton}. \] This must be corrected before print.
The ratio of the two resonance frequencies at the same field is essentially the mass ratio: \[ \frac{\nu_{\text{ESR}}}{\nu_{\text{NMR}}} \approx \frac{\mu_{B}}{\mu_{N}} \approx \frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} \approx 1836 . \] That single number is why NMR is radio frequency and ESR is microwave, and it answers most “which technique uses which part of the spectrum” matching questions in one step.
Formula Summary
Energy scales \(\Delta E_{e} \sim 1\text{--}10\,\mathrm{eV}\), \ \(\Delta E_{v} \sim 0.1\,\mathrm{eV}\), \ \(\Delta E_{r} \sim 0.001\,\mathrm{eV}\) \[ E_{v} \sim \sqrt{\frac{m}{M}}\,E_{e}, \qquad E_{r} \sim \frac{m}{M}\,E_{e} \]
Term value \(\varepsilon = \varepsilon_{e} + G(v) + F(J)\) \[ \bar\nu = (\varepsilon_e'-\varepsilon_e'') + \{G(v')-G(v'')\} + \{F(J')-F(J'')\} \]
Selection rules
\(\Delta\Lambda = 0,\pm1\); \ \(\Delta S = 0\); \
\(\Sigma^{+}\!\leftrightarrow\!\Sigma^{+}\), \(\Sigma^{-}\!\leftrightarrow\!\Sigma^{-}\); \
\(g \leftrightarrow u\)
no restriction on \(\Delta v\); \ \(\Delta J = 0, \pm1\)
(\(\Delta J = 0\) absent if \(\Lambda'=\Lambda''=0\))
Franck–Condon transitions are vertical \[ \begin{array}{ll} r_e' = r_e'' & (0,0) \text{ strongest}\\ r_e' > r_e'' & \text{maximum moves to } (2,0) \text{ etc., falls off both sides}\\ r_e' \gg r_e'' & \text{weak bands} + \text{dissociation continuum} \end{array} \]
Progression one of \(v'\), \(v''\) fixed Sequence \(\Delta v\) fixed
Dissociation energy \(D_{0}'' = \bar\nu_{\text{conv}} - E^{*}\) (\(E^{*}\) = excitation energy of the excited fragment)
Rotational fine structure \(\bar\nu = \bar\nu_{0} + (B'+B'')m + (B'-B'')m^{2}\) \[ m_{\text{head}} = -\frac{B'+B''}{2(B'-B'')}, \qquad \bar\nu_{\text{head}} = \bar\nu_{0} - \frac{(B'+B'')^{2}}{4(B'-B'')} \] \(B' < B''\): head in \(R\), degraded to the red (the common case); \(B' > B''\): head in \(P\), degraded to the violet
Previous Year Questions: Molecular Physics (Chapters 6–10)
A heavy symmetrical top is rotating about its own axis of symmetry (the \(z\)-axis). If \(I_{1}\), \(I_{2}\) and \(I_{3}\) are the principal moments of inertia along the \(x\), \(y\) and \(z\) axes respectively, then
- (a)
\(I_{2}=I_{3}\); \(I_{1}\ne I_{2}\)
- (b)
\(I_{1}=I_{3}\); \(I_{1}\ne I_{2}\)
- (c)
\(I_{1}=I_{2}\); \(I_{1}\ne I_{3}\)
- (d)
\(I_{1}\ne I_{2}\ne I_{3}\)
The emission wavelength for the transition \(D_{2}\to F_{3}\) is \(3122\,\mathrm{Å}\). The ratio of the population of the final to the initial state at a temperature of \(5000\,\mathrm{K}\) is \(\big(h = 6.626\times 10^{-34}\,\mathrm{J}\,\mathrm{s}\), \(c = 3\times 10^{8}\,\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}\), \(k_{B} = 1.380\times 10^{-23}\,\mathrm{J}/\mathrm{K}\big)\)
- (a)
\(2.03\times10^{-5}\)
- (b)
\(4.02\times10^{-5}\)
- (c)
\(7.02\times10^{-5}\)
- (d)
\(9.83\times10^{-5}\)
In a rigid rotator of mass \(M\), if the energy of the first excited state is \(1\,\mathrm{meV}\), then the fourth excited state energy (in \(\mathrm{meV}\)) is
The moment of inertia of a rigid diatomic molecule \(A\) is 6 times that of another rigid diatomic molecule \(B\). If the rotational energies of the two molecules are equal, then the corresponding values of the rotational quantum numbers \(J_{A}\) and \(J_{B}\) are
- (a)
\(J_{A}=2\), \(J_{B}=1\)
- (b)
\(J_{A}=3\), \(J_{B}=1\)
- (c)
\(J_{A}=5\), \(J_{B}=0\)
- (d)
\(J_{A}=6\), \(J_{B}=1\)
The far infrared rotational absorption spectrum of a diatomic molecule shows equidistant lines with spacing \(20\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\). The position of the first Stokes line in the rotational Raman spectrum of this molecule is
- (a)
\(20\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\)
- (b)
\(40\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\)
- (c)
\(60\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\)
- (d)
\(120\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\)
The three principal moments of inertia of a methanol (CH3OH) molecule have the property \(I_{x}=I_{y}=I\) and \(I_{z}\ne I\). The rotational energy eigenvalues are
- (a)
\(\dfrac{\hbar^{2}}{2I}l(l+1) + \dfrac{\hbar^{2}m_{l}^{2}}{2}\left(\dfrac{1}{I_{z}}-\dfrac{1}{I}\right)\)
- (b)
\(\dfrac{\hbar^{2}}{2I}l(l+1)\)
- (c)
\(\dfrac{\hbar^{2}m_{l}^{2}}{2}\left(\dfrac{1}{I_{z}}-\dfrac{1}{I}\right)\)
- (d)
\(\dfrac{\hbar^{2}}{2I}l(l+1) + \dfrac{\hbar^{2}m_{l}^{2}}{2}\left(\dfrac{1}{I_{z}}+\dfrac{1}{I}\right)\)
The expression for the second overtone frequency in the vibrational absorption spectra of a diatomic molecule, in terms of the harmonic frequency \(\omega_{e}\) and the anharmonicity constant \(x_{e}\), is
- (a)
\(2\omega_{e}(1-x_{e})\)
- (b)
\(2\omega_{e}(1-3x_{e})\)
- (c)
\(3\omega_{e}(1-2x_{e})\)
- (d)
\(3\omega_{e}(1-4x_{e})\)
The spacing between vibrational energy levels in the CO molecule is found to be \(8.44\times 10^{-2}\,\mathrm{eV}\). Given that the reduced mass of CO is \(1.14\times 10^{-26}\,\mathrm{kg}\), Planck's constant is \(6.626\times 10^{-34}\,\mathrm{J}\,\mathrm{s}\) and \(1\,\mathrm{eV} = 1.6\times 10^{-19}\,\mathrm{J}\), the force constant of the bond in the CO molecule is
- (a)
\(1.87\,\mathrm{N}/\mathrm{m}\)
- (b)
\(18.7\,\mathrm{N}/\mathrm{m}\)
- (c)
\(187\,\mathrm{N}/\mathrm{m}\)
- (d)
\(1870\,\mathrm{N}/\mathrm{m}\)
The equilibrium vibration frequency for an oscillator is observed at \(2990\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\). The ratio of the frequencies corresponding to the first and the fundamental spectral lines is 1.96. Considering the oscillator to be anharmonic, the anharmonicity constant is
- (a)
0.005
- (b)
0.02
- (c)
0.05
- (d)
0.1
Match the typical spectroscopic regions specified in Group I with the corresponding type of transitions in Group II.
| Group I | Group II |
|---|---|
| (P) Infra-red region | (i) electronic transitions involving valence electrons |
| (Q) Ultraviolet-visible region | (ii) nuclear transitions |
| (R) X-ray region | (iii) vibrational transitions of molecules |
| (S) \(\gamma\)-ray region | (iv) transitions involving inner shell electrons |
- (a)
(P, i); (Q, iii); (R, ii); (S, iv)
- (b)
(P, ii); (Q, iv); (R, i); (S, iii)
- (c)
(P, iii); (Q, i); (R, iv); (S, ii)
- (d)
(P, iv); (Q, i); (R, ii); (S, iii)
Match the typical spectra of stable molecules with the corresponding wave-number range.
| 1. Electronic spectra | (i) \(e6\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) and above |
|---|---|
| 2. Rotational spectra | (ii) \(10^{5}\)–\(e6\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) |
| 3. Molecular dissociation | (iii) \(10^{0}\)–\(e2\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) |
- (a)
1–ii, 2–i, 3–iii
- (b)
1–ii, 2–iii, 3–i
- (c)
1–iii, 2–ii, 3–i
- (d)
1–i, 2–ii, 3–iii
Consider a diatomic molecule formed by identical atoms. If \(E_{V}\) and \(E_{C}\) represent the energy of the vibrational nuclear motion and electronic motion respectively, then in terms of the electronic mass \(m\) and nuclear mass \(M\), \(E_{V}/E_{C}\) is proportional to
- (a)
\(\left(\dfrac{m}{M}\right)^{1/2}\)
- (b)
\(\dfrac{m}{M}\)
- (c)
\(\left(\dfrac{m}{M}\right)^{3/2}\)
- (d)
\(\left(\dfrac{m}{M}\right)^{2}\)
Which one of the following gases of diatomic molecules is Raman, infrared and NMR active?
- (a)
\(^{1}\)H–\(^{1}\)H
- (b)
\(^{12}\)C–\(^{16}\)O
- (c)
\(^{1}\)H–\(^{35}\)Cl
- (d)
\(^{16}\)O–\(^{16}\)O
The molecule \(^{17}\)O2 is
- (a)
Raman active but not NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) active.
- (b)
Infrared active and Raman active but not NMR active.
- (c)
Raman active and NMR active.
- (d)
Only NMR active.
The excitation wavelength of the laser in a Raman effect experiment is \(546\,\mathrm{nm}\). If the Stokes line is observed at \(552\,\mathrm{nm}\), then the wavenumber of the anti-Stokes line (in \(\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\)) is
Match the phrases in Group I and Group II and identify the correct option.
| Group I | Group II |
|---|---|
| (P) Electron spin resonance (ESR) | (i) radio frequency |
| (Q) Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) | (ii) visible range frequency |
| (R) Transition between vibrational states of a molecule | (iii) microwave frequency |
| (S) Electronic transition | (iv) far-infrared range |
- (a)
(P-i), (Q-ii), (R-iii), (S-iv)
- (b)
(P-ii), (Q-i), (R-iv), (S-iii)
- (c)
(P-iii), (Q-iv), (R-i), (S-ii)
- (d)
(P-iii), (Q-i), (R-iv), (S-ii)
The first Stokes line of a rotational Raman spectrum is observed at \(12.96\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\). Considering the rigid rotor approximation, the rotational constant is given by
- (a)
\(6.48\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\)
- (b)
\(3.24\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\)
- (c)
\(2.16\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\)
- (d)
\(1.62\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\)
The spacing between two consecutive \(S\)-branch lines of the rotational Raman spectrum of hydrogen gas is \(243.2\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\). After excitation with a laser of wavelength \(514.5\,\mathrm{nm}\), the Stokes line appeared at \(17611.4\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) for a particular energy level. The wavenumber (rounded off to the nearest integer), in \(\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\), at which the Stokes line will appear for the next higher energy level is
In a solid, a Raman line observed at \(300\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) has an intensity of the Stokes line four times that of the anti-Stokes line. The temperature of the sample is (round off to the nearest integer) \(\left(1\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} \equiv 1.44\,\mathrm{K}\right)\)
In a diatomic molecule of mass \(M\), the electronic, rotational and vibrational energy scales are of magnitude \(E_{e}\), \(E_{R}\) and \(E_{V}\) respectively. The spring constant for the vibrational energy is determined by \(E_{e}\). If the electron mass is \(m\), then
- (a)
\(E_{R} \sim \dfrac{m}{M}E_{e}\)
- (b)
\(E_{R} \sim \sqrt{\dfrac{m}{M}}\,E_{e}\)
- (c)
\(E_{V} \sim \sqrt{\dfrac{m}{M}}\,E_{e}\)
- (d)
\(E_{V} \sim \left(\dfrac{m}{M}\right)^{1/4}E_{e}\)
It is given that the electronic ground state of a diatomic molecule \(X_{2}\) has even parity and the nuclear spin of \(X\) is 0. Which one of the following is the correct statement with regard to the rotational Raman spectrum (\(J\) is the rotational quantum number) of this molecule?
- (a)
Lines of all \(J\) values are present.
- (b)
Lines have alternating intensity in the ratio \(3\!:\!1\).
- (c)
Lines of only even \(J\) values are present.
- (d)
Lines of only odd \(J\) values are present.
Which one of the following options is the most appropriate match between the items given in Column 1 and Column 2?
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| (i) Visible light | P. Transition between core energy levels of atoms |
| (ii) X-rays | Q. Transition between nuclear energy levels |
| (iii) Gamma rays | R. Pair production |
| (iv) Thermal neutrons | S. Crystal structure determination |
| T. Photoelectric effect |
- (a)
(i) – T; (ii) – P, S, T; (iii) – Q, R; (iv) – S
- (b)
(i) – P, T; (ii) – S; (iii) – R, S; (iv) – S, T
- (c)
(i) – T; (ii) – R, S; (iii) – Q, R; (iv) – S
- (d)
(i) – S, T; (ii) – P, S; (iii) – R, T; (iv) – S
The mean distance between the two atoms of an HD molecule is \(r\), where H and D denote hydrogen and deuterium respectively. The mass of the hydrogen atom is \(m_{H}\). The energy difference between the two lowest-lying rotational states of HD, in multiples of \(\hbar^{2}/(m_{H}r^{2})\), is
- (a)
\(\tfrac32\)
- (b)
\(\tfrac23\)
- (c)
\(6\)
- (d)
\(\tfrac43\)
The atomic numbers of V, Cr, Fe and Zn are \(23\), \(24\), \(26\) and \(30\) respectively. Which one of the following materials does not show an electron spin resonance (ESR) spectrum?
- (a)
V
- (b)
Cr
- (c)
Fe
- (d)
Zn
A particle of mass \(m\) moves in the potential \[ V(x) = \begin{cases} V_{0} + \tfrac12 m\omega_{0}^{2}x^{2}, & x>0,\\[2pt] \infty, & x\le 0 . \end{cases} \] Four combinations of \(\omega_{0}\) and \(V_{0}\) are considered:
| Case | \(\omega_{0}\) | \(V_{0}\) |
|---|---|---|
| P | \(12\,\mathrm{rad}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}\) | \(0\) |
| Q | \(12\,\mathrm{rad}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}\) | \(3\hbar\) joule |
| R | \(4\,\mathrm{rad}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}\) | \(4\hbar\) joule |
| S | \(14\,\mathrm{rad}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}\) | \(0\) |
Let \(E_{j}^{(\mathrm{P})}\), \(E_{j}^{(\mathrm{Q})}\), \(E_{j}^{(\mathrm{R})}\) and \(E_{j}^{(\mathrm{S})}\), with \(j = 0,1,2,\dots\), be the eigenenergies of the \(j\)-th level for the four cases. Which of the following statement(s) is/are true?
- (a)
\(E_{0}^{(\mathrm{P})} = E_{0}^{(\mathrm{Q})}\)
- (b)
\(E_{0}^{(\mathrm{Q})} = E_{0}^{(\mathrm{S})}\)
- (c)
\(E_{0}^{(\mathrm{P})} = E_{1}^{(\mathrm{R})}\)
- (d)
\(E_{0}^{(\mathrm{R})} \neq E_{0}^{(\mathrm{Q})}\)
The potential energy of two diatomic molecules P and Q of the same reduced mass is shown in the figure. According to this diagram, which of the following option(s) is/are correct?
- (a)
The equilibrium internuclear distance of Q is more than that of P
- (b)
The total energy \(E=0\) separates bound and unbound states of the molecules
- (c)
The lowest vibrational frequency of P is larger than that of Q
- (d)
The dissociation energy of Q is more than that of P
Solution. A symmetric top has two equal principal moments. Spinning about the symmetry axis \(z\) means the two axes perpendicular to it are equivalent, so \(I_{1}=I_{2}\), while \(I_{3}\) along the figure axis is different.
Solution. By the Boltzmann distribution, including the degeneracies \(g = 2J+1\), \[ \frac{N_{f}}{N_{i}} = \frac{2J_{f}+1}{2J_{i}+1}\, e^{-hc/\lambda k_{B}T} . \] Here the \(D_{2}\) level has \(J=2\) (\(g=5\)) and the \(F_{3}\) level has \(J=3\) (\(g=7\)), so the degeneracy factor is \(5/7\). The exponent is \[ \frac{hc}{\lambda k_{B}T} = \frac{6.626\times10^{-34}\times3\times10^{8}} {3122\times10^{-10}\times1.380\times10^{-23}\times5000} = 9.228 . \] Hence \[ \frac{N_{f}}{N_{i}} = \frac57\,e^{-9.228} = \frac57\times9.83\times10^{-5} = 7.02\times10^{-5} . \]
Option (d), \(9.83\times10^{-5}\), is exactly what you get if you forget the degeneracy factor — it is there as a distractor. The ratio being asked for is the population of the level of degeneracy 5 to that of degeneracy 7, with the former lying \(hc/\lambda\) above the latter.
Solution. For a rigid rotator \(E \propto J(J+1)\) with \(J = 0,1,2,3,\dots\) The ground state is \(J=0\), so the first excited state is \(J=1\) and the fourth excited state is \(J=4\). Therefore \[ \frac{E_{4}}{E_{1}} = \frac{4(4+1)}{1(1+1)} = \frac{20}{2} = 10 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad E_{4} = 10E_{1} = 10\,\mathrm{meV} . \]
“Fourth excited state” means \(J=4\), not \(J=5\). Count from \(J=0\) as the ground state.
Solution. The rotational energy is \(E = \dfrac{\hbar^{2}}{2I}J(J+1)\). Equating the two energies, \[ \frac{J_{A}(J_{A}+1)}{I_{A}} = \frac{J_{B}(J_{B}+1)}{I_{B}} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \frac{J_{A}(J_{A}+1)}{J_{B}(J_{B}+1)} = \frac{I_{A}}{I_{B}} = 6 . \] Testing the options with \(J_{B}=1\), so that \(J_{B}(J_{B}+1)=2\), we need \(J_{A}(J_{A}+1) = 12\), i.e.\ \(J_{A}=3\). Hence \(J_{A}=3\), \(J_{B}=1\).
The manuscript writes the ratio as \(I_{B}/I_{A}\) and concludes \(J_{A}=6\), \(J_{B}=1\) — which is option (d), contradicting the answer (b) it then states. The larger moment of inertia goes with the larger \(J(J+1)\) for equal energies, so the ratio is \(I_{A}/I_{B}\) and (b) is right. Check: option (d) would give \(6\times7/2 = 21 \ne 6\).
Solution. In the far infrared (pure rotational absorption) spectrum the line spacing is \(2B\), so \[ 2B = 20\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad B = 10\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} . \] The first Stokes line in the rotational Raman spectrum lies at \(6B\) from the exciting line: \[ \Delta\bar\nu = 6B = 6\times10 = 60\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} . \]
Solution. CH3OH is a symmetric rotator, \(I_{x}=I_{y}=I \ne I_{z}\). Classically, \[ E = \frac{1}{2I}\left(J_{x}^{2}+J_{y}^{2}\right) + \frac{1}{2I_{z}}J_{z}^{2} . \] Adding and subtracting \(J_{z}^{2}\) so as to build \(J^{2} = J_{x}^{2}+J_{y}^{2}+J_{z}^{2}\), \[ E = \frac{1}{2I}J^{2} + \left(\frac{1}{2I_{z}}-\frac{1}{2I}\right)J_{z}^{2} . \] Quantum mechanically \(J^{2} \to \hbar^{2}l(l+1)\) and \(J_{z}^{2} \to \hbar^{2}m_{l}^{2}\), so \[ E = \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2I}l(l+1) + \frac{\hbar^{2}m_{l}^{2}}{2}\left(\frac{1}{I_{z}}-\frac{1}{I}\right). \]
Option (a) as printed in the manuscript carries a stray \(I\) in the denominator of the second term (\(\hbar^{2}m_{l}^{2}/2I\) rather than \(\hbar^{2}m_{l}^{2}/2\)). It has been typeset above in the form the derivation actually gives. Note that (d) is the same expression with a wrong sign — the difference of reciprocals is what distinguishes a prolate from an oblate top.
Solution. For an anharmonic oscillator \(\varepsilon_{v} = \omega_{e}\left(v+\tfrac12\right) - \omega_{e}x_{e}\left(v+\tfrac12\right)^{2}\). The second overtone is \(v = 0 \to v = 3\): \begin{align*} \bar\nu &= \varepsilon_{v=3}-\varepsilon_{v=0}\\ &= \frac72\omega_{e} - \omega_{e}x_{e}\left(\frac72\right)^{2} - \frac{\omega_{e}}{2} + \omega_{e}x_{e}\left(\frac12\right)^{2}\\ &= 3\omega_{e} - \omega_{e}x_{e}\left(\frac{49}{4}-\frac14\right) = 3\omega_{e} - 12\omega_{e}x_{e} = 3\omega_{e}\left(1-4x_{e}\right). \end{align*}
Solution. The harmonic oscillator has equally spaced levels \(E = h\nu\left(n+\tfrac12\right)\) with \(\nu = \dfrac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\dfrac{k}{\mred}}\), so the spacing is \(\Delta E = h\nu\) and \[ k = \left(\frac{2\pi}{h}\Delta E\right)^{2}\mred . \] With \(\Delta E = 8.44\times10^{-2}\times1.6\times10^{-19}\ \mathrm{J}\), \[ k = \left(\frac{2\times3.14}{6.626\times10^{-34}} \times 8.44\times10^{-2}\times1.6\times10^{-19}\right)^{2} \times 1.14\times10^{-26} = 186.7\,\mathrm{N}/\mathrm{m} \approx 187\,\mathrm{N}/\mathrm{m}. \]
Solution. The fundamental lies at \(\omega_{e}(1-2x_{e})\) and the first overtone at \(2\omega_{e}(1-3x_{e})\). Their ratio is \[ \frac{2\omega_{e}(1-3x_{e})}{\omega_{e}(1-2x_{e})} = 1.96 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \frac{1-3x_{e}}{1-2x_{e}} = 0.98 . \] Hence \(1-3x_{e} = 0.98 - 1.96x_{e}\), giving \(0.02 = 1.04x_{e}\) and \(x_{e} = 0.019 \approx 0.02\).
The value \(2990\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) is not needed — \(\omega_e\) cancels in the ratio. It is supplied only to make the question look harder than it is.
Solution. Infrared \(\leftrightarrow\) vibrational transitions (iii); ultraviolet–visible \(\leftrightarrow\) electronic transitions of valence electrons (i); X-rays \(\leftrightarrow\) inner-shell electrons (iv); \(\gamma\)-rays \(\leftrightarrow\) nuclear transitions (ii).
Solution. Ordering by photon energy: molecular dissociation and ionization sit highest, electronic spectra next, rotational spectra lowest. Hence 1–ii, 2–iii, 3–i.
Range (iii) is printed as “\(10^{8}\)–\(10^{2}\) \(\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\)”, which is both impossible as an ordering and far too large for rotational spectra. It must be \(10^{0}\)–\(e2\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\), which is the standard rotational range and is the only reading that makes the official key (b) correct.
Solution. The vibrational energy scale is \(E_{V} = \hbar\sqrt{k/M}\) with the spring constant \(k\) fixed by the electronic energy scale, \(k \sim E_{e}/a_{0}^{2}\), while \(E_{e} \sim \hbar^{2}/ma_{0}^{2}\). Then \[ \frac{E_{V}}{E_{e}} = \frac{\hbar\sqrt{k/M}}{\hbar^{2}/ma_{0}^{2}} = \sqrt{\frac{m}{M}} . \] Equivalently: \(E_{V} \propto 1/\sqrt{M}\), and the only dimensionless combination of \(m\) and \(M\) with that dependence is \((m/M)^{1/2}\).
Solution. Take the three activities in turn.
\(^{1}\)H–\(^{1}\)H: homonuclear, no dipole moment \(\Rightarrow\) infrared inactive.
\(^{12}\)C–\(^{16}\)O: both nuclei have even \(Z\) and even \(N\), so \(I=0\) \(\Rightarrow\) NMR inactive.
\(^{1}\)H–\(^{35}\)Cl: heteronuclear (IR active), polarizability changes on rotation (Raman active), and both nuclei have non-zero spin (NMR active). Correct.
\(^{16}\)O–\(^{16}\)O: homonuclear \(\Rightarrow\) IR inactive, and \(I=0\) \(\Rightarrow\) NMR inactive.
Solution. For \(^{17}\)O2:
It is homonuclear, so there is no change in dipole moment during the vibration — infrared inactive.
The polarizability does change as the molecule rotates — Raman active.
The \(^{17}\)O nucleus has spin \(I = \tfrac52 \ne 0\) — NMR active.
Hence Raman active and NMR active.
Solution. The Raman displacement is the same on both sides of the exciting line: \[ \Delta\bar\nu = \bar\nu_{AS}-\bar\nu_{0} = \bar\nu_{0}-\bar\nu_{S}, \qquad\text{i.e.}\qquad \frac{1}{\lambda_{AS}}-\frac{1}{\lambda_{0}} = \frac{1}{\lambda_{0}}-\frac{1}{\lambda_{S}} . \] Therefore \[ \frac{1}{\lambda_{AS}} = \frac{2}{\lambda_{0}}-\frac{1}{\lambda_{S}} = \frac{2\lambda_{S}-\lambda_{0}}{\lambda_{0}\lambda_{S}} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \lambda_{AS} = \frac{\lambda_{0}\lambda_{S}}{2\lambda_{S}-\lambda_{0}} . \] Substituting \(\lambda_{0}=546\,\mathrm{nm}\), \(\lambda_{S}=552\,\mathrm{nm}\): \[ \lambda_{AS} = \frac{546\times552}{2\times552-546}\ \mathrm{nm} = \frac{546\times552}{558}\ \mathrm{nm} = 540.13\,\mathrm{nm} = 540.13\times10^{-7}\ \mathrm{cm}. \] Hence \[ \bar\nu_{AS} = \frac{1}{540.13\times10^{-7}\ \mathrm{cm}} = 18514\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} . \]
Solution. ESR uses microwaves (iii); NMR uses radio frequency (i); vibrational transitions use the far infrared (iv); electronic transitions use visible radiation (ii). Note that (P-iii) and (Q-i) alone already eliminate three options.
Solution. The first Stokes line of a rotational Raman spectrum is displaced by \(6B\) from the exciting line. Hence \[ 6B = 12.96\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad B = 2.16\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} . \]
Solution. The spacing between consecutive \(S\)-branch lines of a rotational Raman spectrum is \(4B\): \[ 4B = 243.2\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} . \] Stokes lines are displaced below the exciting line by \(4B\left(J+\tfrac32\right)\), so moving to the next higher rotational level moves the Stokes line down by one further \(4B\): \[ \bar\nu_{\text{next}} = 17611.4 - 4B = 17611.4 - 243.2 = 17368.2\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} \approx 17368 . \] (The laser wavelength \(514.5\,\mathrm{nm}\) is not needed — it only fixes the absolute position of the exciting line.)
Solution. From the Boltzmann ratio of the two starting populations, \[ \frac{I_{S}}{I_{AS}} = e^{\,h\nu/k_{B}T} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad T = \frac{hc\bar\nu}{k_{B}\ln\!\left(I_{S}/I_{AS}\right)} . \] With \(\bar\nu = 300\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} = 3\times 10^{4}\,\mathrm{m}^{-1}\) and \(I_{S}/I_{AS}=4\), \[ T = \frac{6.626\times10^{-34}\times3\times10^{8}\times3\times10^{4}} {1.38\times10^{-23}\times\ln 4} = 311.7\,\mathrm{K} . \] Using the shortcut \(1\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\equiv1.44\,\mathrm{K}\) given in the question, \(T = 300\times1.44/\ln4 = 311.6\,\mathrm{K}\). Either way the accepted range is 311 to 312 K.
Solution. With \(r\) the bond length and \(M\) the molecular mass, \[ E_{R} = \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2Mr^{2}}J(J+1), \qquad E_{V} = \sqrt{\frac{k}{M}}\,\hbar\left(v+\tfrac12\right). \] Since \(r \sim a_{0}\) and \(E_{e} \sim \hbar^{2}/ma_{0}^{2}\), \[ E_{R} \sim \frac{\hbar^{2}}{Ma_{0}^{2}} = \frac{m}{M}E_{e}, \] and, with \(k\) fixed by \(E_{e}\) as in Q12, \[ E_{V} \sim \sqrt{\frac{m}{M}}\,E_{e} . \] So (a) and (c) are both correct. Note the resulting hierarchy \(E_{e} : E_{V} : E_{R} = 1 : (m/M)^{1/2} : (m/M)\) — the same \(1 : 10^{-2} : 10^{-4}\) pattern as \(\eqref{eq:energy-scales}\).
Solution. With \(I(X)=0\) the two nuclei are identical bosons, so the total wavefunction must be symmetric under their exchange. The nuclear spin function is necessarily symmetric (there is only one spin state), and the electronic ground state has even parity, so the rotational wavefunction must be symmetric too. Since the rotational wavefunction has parity \((-1)^{J}\), only even \(J\) levels exist. Odd-\(J\) levels are missing altogether, so only even-\(J\) lines appear.
Contrast with H2, where \(I = \tfrac12\) (fermions) and both parities survive, giving the \(3\!:\!1\) ortho/para intensity alternation of option (b). Zero nuclear spin removes alternate lines completely; non-zero spin only makes them alternate in intensity.
Solution. Visible light (\(\sim2\,\mathrm{eV}\)) can only eject loosely bound electrons — the photoelectric effect (T). X-rays have enough energy for core-level transitions (P), are diffracted by crystal planes (S) and also show the photoelectric effect (T). Gamma rays cause nuclear transitions (Q) and, above \(1.02\,\mathrm{MeV}\), pair production (R). Thermal neutrons have de Broglie wavelengths of order \(1\,\mathrm{Å}\) and are used for crystal structure determination (S).
Solution. The rotational levels of a rigid rotator are \[ E_{J} = \frac{\hbar^{2}J(J+1)}{2I}, \qquad I = \mred r^{2}, \qquad J = 0,1,2,\dots \] For HD the two nuclei have masses \(m_{H}\) and \(2m_{H}\), so \[ \mred = \frac{m_{H}\times 2m_{H}}{m_{H}+2m_{H}} = \frac{2m_{H}}{3} . \] The two lowest levels are \(J=0\) (\(E_{0}=0\)) and \(J=1\) (\(E_{1} = \hbar^{2}/I\)), so \[ \Delta E = \frac{\hbar^{2}}{I} = \frac{\hbar^{2}}{\mred r^{2}} = \frac{3\hbar^{2}}{2m_{H}r^{2}} , \] that is \(\tfrac32\) in the stated units.
The only work in this question is the reduced mass. Note that \(\Delta E\) for \(J=0\to1\) is \(2B\) in wavenumber units and \(\hbar^{2}/I\) in energy units — the factor \(J(J+1)\) contributes \(2\), which cancels the \(2\) in the denominator.
Solution. ESR requires unpaired electrons: the technique detects transitions between the Zeeman sublevels of a non-zero electronic spin, so a species with \(S=0\) gives no signal at all. \[ \text{V} = [\text{Ar}]3d^{3}4s^{2},\quad \text{Cr} = [\text{Ar}]3d^{5}4s^{1},\quad \text{Fe} = [\text{Ar}]3d^{6}4s^{2},\quad \text{Zn} = [\text{Ar}]3d^{10}4s^{2}. \] V, Cr and Fe all have partly filled \(3d\) shells and hence unpaired spins. Zinc has a completely filled \(3d\) shell and a filled \(4s\) shell, so \(S=0\) and there is no ESR spectrum.
Chromium is the configuration examiners expect you to get wrong: it is \(3d^{5}4s^{1}\), not \(3d^{4}4s^{2}\), because a half-filled \(d\) shell together with a half-filled \(s\) shell is the lower-energy arrangement. It is not the answer here — with six unpaired electrons it is the most strongly paramagnetic of the four — but the same trick appears with copper (\(3d^{10}4s^{1}\)).
Solution. The infinite wall at \(x=0\) imposes \(\psi(0)=0\). Of the eigenfunctions of the full harmonic oscillator, only the odd ones vanish at the origin, so the allowed states here are the full oscillator's \(n = 1,3,5,\dots\). Relabelling by \(j = 0,1,2,\dots\) with \(n = 2j+1\), \[ E_{j} = \left(2j+\tfrac32\right)\hbar\omega_{0} + V_{0}. \] Evaluating: \[ E_{0}^{(\mathrm{P})} = \tfrac32(12)\hbar = 18\hbar, \qquad E_{0}^{(\mathrm{Q})} = 18\hbar + 3\hbar = 21\hbar, \] \[ E_{0}^{(\mathrm{R})} = \tfrac32(4)\hbar + 4\hbar = 10\hbar, \qquad E_{1}^{(\mathrm{R})} = \tfrac72(4)\hbar + 4\hbar = 18\hbar, \qquad E_{0}^{(\mathrm{S})} = \tfrac32(14)\hbar = 21\hbar . \] Hence (a) is false (\(18\hbar \neq 21\hbar\)), while (b) \(21\hbar = 21\hbar\), (c) \(18\hbar = 18\hbar\) and (d) \(10\hbar \neq 21\hbar\) are all true.
The source figures label the offsets “\(V_{0} = 3h\) joules” and “\(V_{0} = 4h\) joules”. They must be read as \(3\hbar\) and \(4\hbar\): with \(h\) the equalities in (b) and (c) both fail and the question has no consistent answer. The table above uses \(\hbar\).
The half-oscillator result is worth memorising in its own right: \(E_{j} = (2j+\tfrac32)\hbar\omega\). The ground-state energy is \(\tfrac32\hbar\omega\), three times the half-quantum of the full oscillator, and the level spacing is \(2\hbar\omega\), twice that of the full oscillator. It appears in models of a molecule against a hard surface, and as a warm-up to the radial equation.
Solution. Everything is read off the shape of the curves.
(a) True. The equilibrium bond length \(r_{e}\) is the position of the minimum. Q's minimum sits at larger \(r\).
(b) True. Both curves tend to zero as \(r\to\infty\), so \(U(\infty)=0\) is the dissociation limit: a state with total energy \(E<0\) is bound, one with \(E>0\) is not.
(c) True. For small oscillations \(\omega = \sqrt{k/\mred}\) with \(k = \left.\dd^{2}U/\dd r^{2}\right|_{r_{e}}\). The reduced mass is stated to be the same for both, so \(\omega\) depends only on the curvature at the minimum. P's well is markedly narrower, hence more sharply curved, hence \(\omega_{P} > \omega_{Q}\).
(d) False. The dissociation energy is the depth of the well below the \(U=0\) asymptote. P's minimum is the deeper one, so \(D_{e}(\mathrm{P}) > D_{e}(\mathrm{Q})\).
A Morse curve carries exactly three readable quantities, and questions of this type ask for one or more of them: the position of the minimum gives the bond length, the depth gives the dissociation energy, and the curvature at the minimum gives the force constant and hence the vibrational frequency. Deep and narrow means a short, strong, high-frequency bond. Note that depth and curvature usually go together in real molecules, but the question is testing that you know they are logically independent.
The first absorption line of \(^{12}\)C\(^{16}\)O is at \(3.842\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) while that of \(^{13}\)C\(^{16}\)O is at \(3.673\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\). The ratio of their moments of inertia is
- (a)
1.851
- (b)
1.286
- (c)
1.046
- (d)
1.038
Consider the hydrogen–deuterium molecule HD. If the mean distance between the two atoms is \(0.08\,\mathrm{nm}\) and the mass of the hydrogen atom is \(938\,\mathrm{MeV}\)\(/c^{2}\), then the energy difference \(\Delta E\) between the two lowest rotational states is approximately
- (a)
\(10^{-1}\) eV
- (b)
\(10^{-2}\) eV
- (c)
\(2\times10^{-2}\) eV
- (d)
\(10^{-3}\) eV
The absorption lines arising from pure rotational effects of HCl are observed at \(83.03\), \(103.73\), \(124.30\), \(145.03\) and \(165.51\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\). The moment of inertia of the HCl molecule is \(\left(\text{take } \dfrac{\hbar}{2\pi c} = 5.6\times 10^{-44}\,\mathrm{kg}\,\mathrm{m}\right)\)
- (a)
\(1.1\times 10^{-48}\,\mathrm{kg}\,\mathrm{m}^2\)
- (b)
\(2.8\times 10^{-47}\,\mathrm{kg}\,\mathrm{m}^2\)
- (c)
\(2.8\times 10^{-48}\,\mathrm{kg}\,\mathrm{m}^2\)
- (d)
\(1.1\times 10^{-42}\,\mathrm{kg}\,\mathrm{m}^2\)
If the leading anharmonic correction to the energy of the \(n\)th vibrational level of a diatomic molecule is \(-x_{e}\left(n+\tfrac12\right)^{2}\hbar\omega\) with \(x_{e}=0.001\), the total number of energy levels possible is approximately
- (a)
500
- (b)
1000
- (c)
250
- (d)
750
A diatomic molecule has vibrational states with energies \(E_{v} = \hbar\omega\left(v+\tfrac12\right)\) and rotational states with energies \(E_{j} = Bj(j+1)\), where \(v\) and \(j\) are non-negative integers. Consider the transitions in which both the initial and final states are restricted to \(v \le 1\) and \(j \le 2\), subject to the selection rules \(\Delta v = \pm1\) and \(\Delta j = \pm1\). The largest allowed energy of transition is
- (a)
\(\hbar\omega-3B\)
- (b)
\(\hbar\omega-B\)
- (c)
\(\hbar\omega+4B\)
- (d)
\(2\hbar\omega+B\)
A laser operating at \(500\,\mathrm{nm}\) is used to excite a molecule. If the Stokes line is observed at \(770\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) (Raman shift), the approximate positions of the Stokes and the anti-Stokes lines are
- (a)
\(481.5\,\mathrm{nm}\) and \(520\,\mathrm{nm}\)
- (b)
\(481.5\,\mathrm{nm}\) and \(500\,\mathrm{nm}\)
- (c)
\(500\,\mathrm{nm}\) and \(520\,\mathrm{nm}\)
- (d)
\(500\,\mathrm{nm}\) and \(600\,\mathrm{nm}\)
The energy levels corresponding to the rotational motion of a molecule are \(E_{J} = BJ(J+1)\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1}\), where \(J = 0,1,2,\dots\) and \(B\) is a constant. Pure rotational Raman transitions follow the selection rule \(\Delta J = 0, \pm2\). When the molecule is irradiated, the separation between the closest Stokes and anti-Stokes lines (in \(\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\)) is
- (a)
\(6B\)
- (b)
\(12B\)
- (c)
\(4B\)
- (d)
\(8B\)
In a spectrum resulting from Raman scattering, let \(I_{R}\) denote the intensity of Rayleigh scattering, and \(I_{S}\) and \(I_{AS}\) the most intense Stokes and anti-Stokes lines respectively. The correct order of these intensities is
- (a)
\(I_{S}>I_{R}>I_{AS}\)
- (b)
\(I_{R}>I_{S}>I_{AS}\)
- (c)
\(I_{AS}>I_{R}>I_{S}\)
- (d)
\(I_{R}>I_{AS}>I_{S}\)
The Raman rotational–vibrational spectrum of nitrogen molecules is observed using incident radiation of wavenumber \(12500\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\). In the first shifted band, the wavenumbers of the observed lines (in \(\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\)) are \(10150\), \(10158\), \(10170\), \(10182\) and \(10190\). The values of the vibrational frequency and the rotational constant (in \(\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\)) respectively are
- (a)
2330 and 2
- (b)
2350 and 2
- (c)
2350 and 3
- (d)
2330 and 3
For the OH molecule the dissociation energy is \(D = 4.18\,\mathrm{eV}\) and the rotational constant is \(B = 18.8\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\). The minimum rotational quantum number \(J\) at which the molecule would dissociate by rotation alone is closest to
- (a)
\(114\)
- (b)
\(454\)
- (c)
\(45\)
- (d)
\(90\)
In a rotational–vibrational spectrum of HCl (H35Cl), the first \(R\)-branch line and the first \(P\)-branch line are observed at \(\tilde\nu = 2906\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) and \(\tilde\nu = 2865\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) respectively. The equilibrium bond length of this molecule would be closest to
- (a)
\(0.2\,\mathrm{Å}\)
- (b)
\(1.3\,\mathrm{Å}\)
- (c)
\(13\,\mathrm{Å}\)
- (d)
\(2.1\,\mathrm{Å}\)
Solution. The first absorption line of a rigid rotator (\(J = 0 \to 1\)) lies at \(2B\). Hence \[ 2B_{1} = 3.842\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} \Rightarrow B_{1} = 1.921\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}, \qquad 2B_{2} = 3.673\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} \Rightarrow B_{2} = 1.8365\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} . \] Since \(B = h/8\pi^{2}Ic\), \(B \propto 1/I\), so \[ \frac{I_{2}}{I_{1}} = \frac{B_{1}}{B_{2}} = \frac{1.921}{1.8365} = 1.046 . \]
Solution. The rotational levels are \(E = \dfrac{h^{2}}{8\pi^{2}I}J(J+1) = AJ(J+1)\), so the two lowest levels (\(J=0\) and \(J=1\)) are separated by \[ \Delta E = 2A = \frac{\hbar^{2}}{I}, \qquad I = \mred r^{2} . \] For HD, \(\mred = \dfrac{M_{H}M_{D}}{M_{H}+M_{D}} = \dfrac{M_{H}\times2M_{H}}{3M_{H}} = \tfrac23 M_{H}\), so \(\mred c^{2} = \tfrac23\times938\,\mathrm{MeV} = 625.3\,\mathrm{MeV}\). Working in natural units with \(\hbar c = 197.3\,\mathrm{eV}\,\mathrm{nm}\), \[ \Delta E = \frac{(\hbar c)^{2}}{\mred c^{2}\,r^{2}} = \frac{(197.3)^{2}\ \mathrm{eV}^{2}\,\mathrm{nm}^{2}} {625.3\times10^{6}\ \mathrm{eV}\times(0.08)^{2}\ \mathrm{nm}^{2}} = 9.7\times10^{-3}\ \eV \approx 10^{-2}\ \eV . \]
Solution. The lines are equally spaced by \(2B\): \[ 103.73-83.03 = 20.70, \quad 124.30-103.73 = 20.57, \quad 145.03-124.30 = 20.73\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1} . \] Averaging, \[ 2B = \frac{20.70+20.57+20.73}{3} = 20.67\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} \Rightarrow B = 10.33\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} = 1033\,\mathrm{m}^{-1} . \] Then, with \(B = h/8\pi^{2}Ic\), \[ I = \frac{h}{8\pi^{2}Bc} = \frac{27.99\times10^{-45}}{1033} = 2.7\times10^{-47}\ \mathrm{kg}\,\mathrm{m}^2 \approx 2.8\times 10^{-47}\,\mathrm{kg}\,\mathrm{m}^2, \] using \(h/8\pi^{2}c = 27.99\times10^{-45}\) in SI units.
This question appears twice in the source, as Q3 and again as Q9, with identical wording, options and solution. Only one copy has been kept.
Solution. For the anharmonic oscillator \(E_{v} = \left(v+\tfrac12\right)\hbar\omega - x_{e}\left(v+\tfrac12\right)^{2}\hbar\omega\). Levels exist only while the energy still increases with \(v\); the highest level is where \(\dd E_{v}/\dd v = 0\): \[ \hbar\omega - 2x_{e}\left(v_{\max}+\tfrac12\right)\hbar\omega = 0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad v_{\max} = \frac{1}{2x_{e}}-\frac12 . \] With \(x_{e} = 0.001\), \[ v_{\max} = \frac{1}{0.002}-\frac12 = 500 - 0.5 \approx 500 . \]
Solution. The transition energy is \[ \Delta E = \hbar\omega\,\Delta v + B\left[j'(j'+1)-j(j+1)\right] . \] The largest value needs \(\Delta v = +1\) and the largest allowed increase in the rotational term. With \(j \le 2\) and \(\Delta j = \pm1\), the two possible upward rotational steps are \(j=0\to1\) (giving \(B[2-0]=2B\)) and \(j=1\to2\) (giving \(B[6-2]=4B\)). The larger is \(4B\), so \[ \Delta E_{\max} = \hbar\omega + 4B . \]
Solution. The exciting wavenumber is \[ \bar\nu_{0} = \frac{1}{500\times10^{-7}\ \mathrm{cm}} = 20000\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} . \] The Raman shift is \(770\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\), so \[ \bar\nu_{S} = 20000-770 = 19230\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} \Rightarrow \lambda_{S} = 520\,\mathrm{nm}, \] \[ \bar\nu_{AS} = 20000+770 = 20770\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} \Rightarrow \lambda_{AS} = 481.5\,\mathrm{nm}. \] Hence \(481.5\,\mathrm{nm}\) and \(520\,\mathrm{nm}\).
The manuscript's solution calls \(19230\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) the “Raman shift” (it is the Stokes position), then places the anti-Stokes line at \(19230+20000 = 39230\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\) and quotes wavelengths of \(254.9\,\mathrm{nm}\) and \(12987\,\mathrm{nm}\). Those numbers are not physical — the Stokes and anti-Stokes lines must straddle the exciting line, so they cannot be at 255 and \(12987\,\mathrm{nm}\) when the laser is at \(500\,\mathrm{nm}\). No answer letter was given in the source; it is (a).
Solution. With \(\Delta J = \pm2\) the Raman shift is \[ \left|\Delta\bar\nu\right| = \varepsilon_{J+2}-\varepsilon_{J} = B(4J+6) . \] The Stokes and anti-Stokes lines therefore sit at \[ \bar\nu_{S} = \bar\nu_{0}-B(4J+6), \qquad \bar\nu_{AS} = \bar\nu_{0}+B(4J+6). \] The closest pair is \(J=0\), and their separation is \[ \bar\nu_{AS}-\bar\nu_{S} = 2B(4J+6)\big|_{J=0} = 12B . \]
Solution. The Rayleigh line is elastic scattering and is always the strongest. Between the two Raman lines, the Stokes process starts from the heavily populated lower level while the anti-Stokes process must start from a sparsely populated upper level, so \[ \frac{I_{S}}{I_{AS}} = e^{\,h\nu_{m}/k_{B}T} > 1 . \] Hence \(I_{R} > I_{S} > I_{AS}\).
Solution. The central line of the shifted band is the pure vibrational (\(Q\)) line, here \(10170\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\). The vibrational frequency is the shift from the exciting line: \[ \omega_{0} = 12500-10170 = 2330\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} . \] The lines at \(10150\), \(10158\) lie on one side and \(10182\), \(10190\) on the other; these are the rotational Raman satellites, spaced by \(4B\): \[ 10158-10150 = 8\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} = 4B \quad\Longrightarrow\quad B = 2\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} . \] So the answer is 2330 and 2.
The manuscript's working prints “\(1058-1050 = 8\)”, dropping a digit from each of \(10158\) and \(10150\), and the option list gives “Option ID: 187” twice. Neither affects the answer.
Solution. Rotational dissociation occurs when the rotational energy alone reaches the dissociation energy: \[ E_{J} = hcB\,J(J+1) \ \ge\ D \qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad J(J+1) \ \ge\ \frac{D}{hcB}. \] Convert \(B\) to energy with \(1\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} \equiv 1.24\times 10^{-4}\,\mathrm{eV}\): \[ hcB = 18.8\times1.24\times10^{-4} = 2.33\times 10^{-3}\,\mathrm{eV}, \] \[ J(J+1) \ \ge\ \frac{4.18}{2.33\times10^{-3}} = 1793 . \] Solving the quadratic \(J^{2}+J-1793 = 0\), \[ J = \frac{-1+\sqrt{1+4\times1793}}{2} = \frac{-1+\sqrt{7173}}{2} = \frac{-1+84.7}{2} = 41.8 , \] so \(J_{\min} = 42\), and the nearest printed option is \(45\).
The rigid-rotator estimate gives \(42\); the option list forces \(45\). Tell students that the estimate is deliberately crude: as \(J\) climbs into the forties the bond is stretched enormously by centrifugal distortion, so \(B\) is no longer constant and the true threshold has to be found from the effective potential \(U(r) + \hbar^{2}J(J+1)/2\mred r^{2}\) rather than from a fixed \(B\). The purpose of the question is the order of magnitude — tens, not hundreds — which is enough to eliminate options (a), (b) and (d).
Solution. In a rotation–vibration band there is no \(Q\) branch, so the two innermost lines straddle the missing band centre \(\tilde\nu_{0}\): \[ R(0) = \tilde\nu_{0} + 2B, \qquad P(1) = \tilde\nu_{0} - 2B . \] Their separation is therefore \(4B\), not \(2B\): \[ 4B = 2906 - 2865 = 41\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} \qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad B = 10.25\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1} . \] The reduced mass of H35Cl is \[ \mred = \frac{1\times35}{36}\ \mathrm{u} = 0.972\ \mathrm{u} = 1.614\times 10^{-27}\,\mathrm{kg}. \] From \(B = h/(8\pi^{2}c\mred r^{2})\), with \(c\) in \(\mathrm{cm}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}\) because \(B\) is in \(\mathrm{cm}^{-1}\), \[ r^{2} = \frac{h}{8\pi^{2}c\,\mred B} = \frac{6.626\times10^{-34}} {78.96\times3\times10^{10}\times1.614\times10^{-27}\times10.25} = 1.70\times 10^{-20}\,\mathrm{m}^{2}, \] \[ r = 1.30\times 10^{-10}\,\mathrm{m} = \boxed{1.3\,\mathrm{Å}} . \]
The factor of four is the whole question. Reading the gap as \(2B\) halves \(B\), which multiplies \(r\) by \(\sqrt{2}\) and lands you on option (d), \(2.1\,\mathrm{Å}\) — which is exactly why that distractor is there. Remember that the \(R\) and \(P\) branches are separated by \(4B\) at the band centre and by \(2B\) everywhere else within a branch.
The H2 molecule has a reduced mass \(\mred = 8.35\times 10^{-28}\,\mathrm{kg}\) and an equilibrium internuclear distance \(R = 0.742\times 10^{-10}\,\mathrm{m}\). The rotational energy in terms of the rotational quantum number \(J\) is
- (a)
\(E_{\text{rot}}(J) = 7J(J-1)\) meV
- (b)
\(E_{\text{rot}}(J) = \tfrac52 J(J+1)\) meV
- (c)
\(E_{\text{rot}}(J) = 7J(J+1)\) meV
- (d)
\(E_{\text{rot}}(J) = \tfrac52 J(J-1)\) meV
The value of the elastic constant for copper is about \(100\,\mathrm{N}/\mathrm{m}\) and the atomic spacing is \(0.256\,\mathrm{nm}\). What is the amplitude of vibration of the Cu atoms at \(300\,\mathrm{K}\), as a percentage of the equilibrium separation?
- (a)
4.55 %
- (b)
3.55 %
- (c)
2.55 %
- (d)
1.55 %
Which functional form of potential best describes the interaction between a neutral atom and an ion at large distances (i.e.\ much larger than their diameters)?
- (a)
\(V \propto -1/r^{2}\)
- (b)
\(V \propto -1/r\)
- (c)
\(V \propto -e^{-r/a}/r\)
- (d)
\(V \propto -1/r^{3}\)
Solution. The rotational energy is \(E = \dfrac{\hbar^{2}}{2I}J(J+1)\) with \(I = \mred R^{2}\): \[ I = 8.35\times10^{-28}\times\left(0.742\times10^{-10}\right)^{2} = 4.597\times 10^{-48}\,\mathrm{kg}\,\mathrm{m}^2 . \] Then \[ \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2I} = \frac{\left(1.05\times10^{-34}\right)^{2}}{2\times4.597\times10^{-48}} = \frac{1.112\times10^{-68}}{9.18\times10^{-48}} = 1.21\times10^{-21}\ \mathrm{J} . \] Converting, \[ \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2I} = \frac{1.21\times10^{-21}}{1.6\times10^{-19}}\ \eV = 7.57\times10^{-3}\ \eV = 7.57\,\mathrm{meV} \approx 7\,\mathrm{meV} . \] Hence \(E_{\text{rot}}(J) \approx 7J(J+1)\) meV.
Solution. For a one-dimensional oscillator the equipartition theorem gives \(\langle K\!.E.\rangle = \tfrac12 k_{B}T\) and \(\langle P\!.E.\rangle = \tfrac12 k_{B}T\), so the total energy is \(\langle E\rangle = k_{B}T\). Equating this to the maximum potential energy \(\tfrac12\beta A^{2}\), \[ k_{B}T = \tfrac12\beta A^{2} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad A = \sqrt{\frac{2k_{B}T}{\beta}} = \sqrt{\frac{2\times1.38\times10^{-23}\times300}{100}} = \sqrt{8.28\times10^{-23}} . \] Hence \(A = 9.09\times10^{-12}\ \mathrm{m} = 0.00909\,\mathrm{nm}\), and as a percentage of the atomic spacing, \[ \frac{A}{a} = \frac{0.00909}{0.256} = 0.0355 = 3.55\,\% . \]
Compare with the Lindemann criterion, which says a solid melts when the vibrational amplitude reaches roughly 10 % of the interatomic spacing. At \(300\,\mathrm{K}\) copper is at 3.6 % — comfortably solid, as it should be given a melting point of \(1358\,\mathrm{K}\).
Solution. An ion of charge \(q\) produces a field \(E \propto q/r^{2}\) at the neutral atom. This field induces a dipole moment \(p = \alpha E \propto 1/r^{2}\) in the atom, and the interaction energy of an induced dipole with the field that induced it is \[ V = -\tfrac12\alpha E^{2} \propto -\frac{1}{r^{4}} . \] The attraction is therefore short-ranged compared with a Coulomb interaction. Among the printed options, (a) is the official key.
The physically correct answer for a charge–induced-dipole interaction is \(V \propto -1/r^{4}\), which is not one of the four printed options, so the printed option list is very likely corrupt — the intended fourth option was almost certainly \(-1/r^{4}\). Students should in any case be told which results to memorise: \(-1/r^{4}\) for an ion and a neutral atom, and \(-1/r^{6}\) (van der Waals) for two neutral atoms.